The guide

Montessori and Waldorf (Steiner) schools in Europe

Updated 21 October 2026

Montessori and Waldorf (also called Steiner) are the two best-known alternative approaches to schooling in Europe. Both place the child's development at the centre, both reject a purely exam-driven model in the early years, and both are often confused with one another. They are in fact quite different in method, philosophy and practice.

This guide explains each approach plainly, notes what the research does and does not show, and offers advice on how to judge an individual school.

Montessori in brief

Montessori education grew from the work of Maria Montessori. The Association Montessori Internationale (AMI) describes its aim as developing the whole child and building the ability to become a fulfilled, productive adult, combining academic learning with creative thinking and an understanding of others. Teachers act as guides who help children learn independently, in environments designed around each stage of development.

In practice, a Montessori classroom typically has:

Programmes are commonly organised by age: 0 to 3, 3 to 6, 6 to 12 and 12 to 18, reflecting Montessori's idea of successive "planes" of development. Many schools stop at six or twelve, so it is worth checking whether the school continues to the age your child will need.

Waldorf (Steiner) in brief

Waldorf education derives from the ideas of Rudolf Steiner and his philosophy of anthroposophy. It describes three developmental stages, early childhood, elementary and secondary, each lasting about seven years. Elementary schooling covers ages 7 to 14, and most schools begin secondary education at 14.

Characteristic features include:

Worldwide, Waldorf education reports more than 1,200 independent schools and nearly 2,000 kindergartens in 75 countries. Germany, the United States and the Netherlands have the most Waldorf schools.

The main differences

MontessoriWaldorf (Steiner)
FounderMaria MontessoriRudolf Steiner
Early reading and writingIndividual pace, often earlierFormal teaching from about age 7
Teacher roleGuide and observerClass teacher leading the group
Learning materialsSpecially designed, self-correctingNatural materials, arts, storytelling
Child's freedomChoice within a prepared environmentRhythm and structure set by the teacher
TechnologyVaries by schoolOften restricted in the early years
PhilosophyDevelopmental psychologyAnthroposophy

Neither approach is superior in itself. They suit different children and different families.

What does the research say?

Research on both approaches is limited, and results are mixed.

For Montessori, studies from several decades report generally favourable results, including a 2003 meta-analysis showing strong achievement effects and a randomised study from 2017. Other findings are conditional: a 2017 review found stronger effects when schools followed the original method closely, and a 2020 study of American public Montessori schools found lower third-grade mathematics scores but better English language arts outcomes. Results are mixed overall, partly because it is hard to control variables in real classrooms and to separate the effect of the method from family background.

For Waldorf, a 2005 review found evidence of academic achievement as well as creative and social growth, but independent studies have not shown that the approach achieves its aims better than other methods. European Waldorf pupils report greater enjoyment of school and better relationships with teachers than pupils in state schools. Systematic empirical research is scarce.

These findings come from secondary summaries, and the evidence base is modest. The honest conclusion is that neither approach has been shown to be clearly better or worse for academic attainment, and that quality varies more between schools than between methods.

A point about names: anyone can say "Montessori"

The name Montessori is not protected. A 1967 ruling by the US Patent and Trademark Office found that the term has generic or descriptive significance, and some advocates believe that has led to schools using the name without following the principles. Therefore, "Montessori" on a sign tells you very little.

For Waldorf, the position is different in part: the name is trademarked in the United States when used for the educational method, and coordinating bodies certify use of the registered names "Waldorf" and "Steiner school." Even so, you should confirm membership of the national or international association.

Practical checks for a Montessori school:

For a Waldorf school, ask about membership of the national Waldorf federation and the training of class teachers.

Matters to consider honestly

Waldorf education has attracted criticism, and a fair guide should say so. Critics point to the anthroposophical basis of the curriculum and to Steiner's esoteric ideas, and some schools have faced controversy over his connections to racist ideology. There have also been concerns about vaccine hesitancy among parent communities and, in England, some Waldorf-based academies rated inadequate by Ofsted on safeguarding. Many Waldorf schools state that they have moved away from or do not teach these ideas; the correct approach is to ask the school directly how anthroposophy features in the curriculum and to read inspection reports.

For Montessori, the concerns are mainly practical: variable quality under an unprotected name, and the difficulty some children face moving to a conventional school with less freedom.

Transition and qualifications

Both approaches face questions at the exit. Montessori secondary programmes are less common and often prepare for national or international qualifications. Waldorf schools in many countries prepare pupils for the state leaving examinations, and some offer additional qualifications. If your child is likely to return to a conventional system, ask the school where leavers go and how they cope with the change.

A common compromise is to choose Montessori or Waldorf for the early years and move to a conventional or IB school at around 11 to 14. This works well for many children, provided the receiving school is warned and offers some help with the change in expectations, such as formal homework and examinations.

Who each approach tends to suit

Neither is a guarantee. Visit, watch the children at work, and ask yourself whether your child would be happy in that room on a Tuesday afternoon.

Sources